Furry Art Pile

8 comments

1. 

   Comment from ♥locoindigo, 1 month ago (#131112)

   FF3 / Ubuntu 8.04 + noscript + adblock+: works. 'work queue' wraps onto the next line on the subpages, and everything overflows the brown curved box at the bottom because of this. The gallery says that art will open in a popup window, but it actually opens in the current one (and I can use my middle button for open-in-new-tab like I normally do - thank you!)
   
   FF3, turning noscript off temporarily: same deal, except that the art pages now pop up. I don't need to turn off my popup blocker. Popups irritate me, but middle button still works.
   
   Lynx 2.8.6rel.4: yikes. It's full of [img_main_nav_updates.gif] nonsense. You need to provide alt texts for greater accessibility.
   
   Everything feels too constrained and cramped. Liquid design, pls! I have a big screen on one machine and an ikkle tiny phone screen on another. Good design ought to scale to both.
   
   Failed expectations: I can't click on "zhivart" to get back to the top page like I expected. Clicking on thumbnail on the top page doesn't show me the corresponding art page, instead it routes me to the gallery and I have to choose again (after scrolling down for miles, and after I've forgotten what it is I wanted to see).

   Staring at you, blinking unnervingly infrequently.
   • Reply
2. 

   Comment from *DireWolf505, 1 month ago (#124556)

   Works fer me!

   Check Six,
   DireWolf505 Out.
   • Reply
3. 

   Comment from *zekumas, 1 month ago (#123510)

   Using FireFox 3.0 and not a problem.
   • Reply
4. 

   Comment from *brokenfox, 1 month ago (#122785)

   I'm using Opera and for the most part it looks fine. However on the main page the bottom line of the box and the background image behind it seem to be down a pixle or two, leaving a while line across it. Also there is a funny jumble of letters and numbers on the bottom of the main page only that say "fzhee3ehe"
   
   The rest of the pages look fine and everything functions otherwise.
   
   (Opera 9.52)
   • Reply
   1. 

      Comment from *zhivagod, 1 month ago (#122810)

      Fixed the fhzee thing, working on solving the pixel problem. Thanks so much ^^
      • Reply
      1. 

         Comment from *brokenfox, 1 month ago (#122931)

         Hay, I just checked it out and it looks great now. :D
         • Reply
5. 

   Comment from *Webster⚥, 1 month ago (#122729)

   Seems just fine, though you might want to put the style tags inside the head tag inside the HTML tag, as otherwise that might bunge up older/odder browsers.

   ⌁
   • Reply
   1. 

      Comment from *zhivagod, 1 month ago (#122732)

      Yeah, I know I need to get that done ^^;; I'm working on that now, but for now I just wanted to make sure it works. ^^
      • Reply
      1. 

         Comment from *Webster⚥, 1 month ago (#122739)

         And after the update, the "omg update" bit kind of broke the layout, as there's a pixel-wide gap now (Firefox 3)

         ⌁
         • Reply
         1. 

            Comment from *zhivagod, 1 month ago (#122761)

            Eep, alrighty, thanks ^^
            • Reply
6. 

   Comment from *kjorteo, 1 month ago (#122706)

   Are there supposed to be links? Like, should clicking on updates/gallery/etc. actually do something? If not and if that's just sort of a "how does this template look" splash page thing, then it looks fine. :) If there are supposed to be links, then, uh, there might be a problem with that.
   
   (Firefox 3.0)
   • Reply
   1. 

      Comment from *zhivagod, 1 month ago (#122728)

      Garh! I know exactly what happened ^^;; They are supposed to link, but I accidentally overwrote the file with an older one. I'm fixing it now, check back in a few minutes. ^^
      • Reply
      1. 

         Comment from *kjorteo, 1 month ago (#123061)

         Works great now. :D
         • Reply
7. 

   Comment from *vlcice, 1 month ago (#122643)

   It seems to work fine in Safari 3 for Mac OS X!
   • Reply
8. 

   Comment from *marcvre, 1 month ago (#122614)

   Nope I'm using Firefox.
   • Reply
   1. 

      Comment from *zhivagod, 1 month ago (#122675)

      Whats wrong with it? What version of FF are you using?
      • Reply
      1. 

         Comment from *marcvre, 1 month ago (#123629)

         I'm not having any trouble with it. I'm using the current upgrade of Firefox.
         • Reply